Select Page

A study published recently in the Society & Animals journal looked at how human beings relate to rats of different types: “sewer” rats, “lab” rats and “pet” rats. The positive and negative aspects of these interactions depend upon the settings in which they occur, and serve as an example of how human-animal relations can be complex and contradictory.

Study Summary:

A study done by Koen Beumer in The Netherlands notes that “[f]or much of recorded history, the relationship between humans and rats in Western societies can be described as outright hostile,” with rats often being associated with filth and disease. This engendered the common fear of rats, known as musophobia. The domestication and use of rats for research purposes happened around the same time (early 19th century) that “fancy rats” were first bred as household companions, and many of the latter variety now enjoy affectionate popularity alongside dogs, cats and other animals. Such strikingly variable circumstances lead the author to conclude that “the relative order and stability of human-animal relations is a precarious accomplishment, which should be studied rather than assumed…. even if multiple and contradictory relations coexist and confront each other.”

Policy Implications:

How we think about animals is foundational to how we treat them. Beumer emphasizes the idea of “situated practice” to help understand the very different forms of human-rat relationships seen throughout history. That variability is possible because any particular human-rat relationship is a “practical accomplishment.” The “lab rat,” the urban rat, and the fancy rat are enactments or constructions. This way of thinking about the nonhuman animal part of human-animal relationships can be contrasted with two others: the essentialist view that the inherent features of rats and other animals are determinative, and the opposite view that animals are putty in our hands, shaped to meet our own needs. For Boemer, the forms of relationship are shaped by situated practices in which both parties of the relationship are actors or agents. This way of thinking about other animals, while not promising it, can be a platform for their more respectful and less exploitative treatment.

– Ken Shapiro, Jill Howard Church

Beumer, K. (2014). Catching the Rat: Understanding Multiple and Contradictory Human-Rat Relations as Situated Practices. Society & Animals, 22, 8-25.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Unless otherwise noted, all content on this website is copyright © 2018 The Animals and Society Institute. Please visit to find out more about our reprint and use policies.

Share Us Online